Pages

Showing posts with label archetypes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label archetypes. Show all posts

Saturday, November 10, 2012

Novel writing and the Historicity beyond


Novel Typology through Historical Lenses

Points: Abstract Synthesis in writing novel.

Dilthey’s method was having traces of Kantian philosophy.
It showed a kind of inclination towards irrational-ism.

Hegelian influence in theory of novel:

1.     Mode of totality in epic and dramatic art. 
2.     One important legacy of Hegel is the historicisation of aesthetic categories. 
3.     Towards a general dialectic of literary genres. 
4.     Question of life & relation to essence in epics 
5.     World of platonic forms and methodological archetypes. 

Frederic Jameson on Georg Lukács:

  • As a cultural object, Marxism returns itself against general activity in general to devalue it and lay bare its class privileges and the leisure which it presupposes for its enjoyment. 
  • Hegelian Lukács of the Theory of the novel
  • The chief conceptual opposition within which all of the examinations of literature have taken place is the famous Hegelian one of the concrete and abstract. 
  • Epic, Tragedy and platonic philosophies. 
  • Abstract idealism of Novel typology. How Don Quixote differs … Heroes of abstract idealism no longer find their justification in the moment of history, but increasingly to become arbitrary, mere grotesques. Here the external world is merely temporal. 
  • Cases in Dickens, Balzac etc – we can see a sort of de-totalized totality. With Balzac novel of abstract idealism has exhausted as a form. 
  • Novel of romantic disillusionment. Here the external world achieves temporal qualities. Flaubert’s ‘Education Sentimentale’. Here again novel achieves a sense of unity. 
  • Goethe’s Wilhem Meister and in novels of Tolstoy A third category of Synthesis type.
  • Marx dissolved Hegelian series of ideal forms into empirical reality of History. 
  • Trajectory from metaphysics to history in Lukacs.
  • It is history rather than nature which constitutes the privileged object of human knowledge.
  • Class consciousness is not so much an empirical and psychological phenomenon, or those collective manifestations explored by sociology.