Comparing Two Poets: Neruda & Yeats
Two
greatest artists of 20th century share a lot of immediate
similarities.
It
is Neruda (July 12, 1904–September 23, 1973) and Yeats (13 June 1865 - 28
January 1939). Both were recipients of Nobel Prize. Both of them held political
positions. But Neruda could only live two more years after receiving the Nobel.
Yeats: A true National
Poet
Yeats
saw early half of 20th century only, seeing two world wars and its
reverberations on the Irish nationalism. He could see the imperial royal waves
and decolonization spree that happened to British imperialism. But he was
deeply affected by the drifting conscience of Irish nationalism alike the
personal unfulfilled love towards Maud Gonne. He was influenced by all sorts of
knowledge and philosophical systems in history. His sensibility was attuned by
the intellectual beauty of womanhood and historical legacy of Ireland. His
personal agonies accentuated his poetic sensibility towards a greater national
consciousness. It stirred a new spirit in the national arena, inspiring
contemporary artists and future ones to come. His poetry was the reflection of
the Irish psyche eager to see the dawn of nationhood, above the clutches of
British Empire.
Yeats
drew energy from the pagan folklores and Gaelic myths. His imagery was full of
Celtic threads and had a poetic vision in par with any great national poet. He
sensed the troublesome future of nationhood. In the twilight of life he was
attracted to the ideals of totalitarianism through Ezra Pound, but regained his
senses and became attracted to the republican waves in Spain. He interacted
with Neruda through letters about the Spanish Civil war and the dangers of
fascism.
Though
influenced by all sort of religious myths and philosophies when it came to the
cause of nationalism, Yeats fought with Catholic Church for interfering with
politics and stirring a divide between South and North Ireland regions. Thus
Yeats saw a tumourous period of Irish history.
Thus
national sovereignty and personal quest for love were two unflinching ends of a
poetic beacon named W.B.Yeats.
Neruda: A true Working
Class Poet for all the nations
For
Neruda everything was lovable even when it is invisible and absent. He loved
abundance of nature and sang like the ancient nomadic tribe free to wander the
entire earth. But he was devoid of any
sort of wealth and was accompanied by stark wings of poverty. He had to embrace
the wings of darkness to feel the depths of real women. But he epitomized women
and craved for uniting with female soul, when he was in exile in Rangoon. So Neruda started from null and void of
nature and traveled through the Asian continent. He invented a new style in
Spanish poetry with his The Twenty Love Poems. His poetry captured the
attention of awakening Chile. He became a cultural diplomat of a continent rich
with myths and human harmony with nature. Neruda was a human being his senses
were awakened every time seeing the meta-narratives of life, be absence of
love, despair for freedom, and greatness of Inca civilizations. His encounters
in Spain with Lorca made his views truly revolutionary.
May
be we can say that for Yeats love and nationalism were inspired by the
intellectual admiration for womanhood of Maud Gonne and this sense continued
with Yeats till the end of his life. But for Neruda, he was more than a
national poet who drew abstract energies from concrete beauty of life. He
learned the beauty of things which have been shielded from him, yet he never
gave up. He continued to see the matter of things from a labourer’s
perspective.
If
women’s beauty is not my personal asset, let it be a public asset. He praised
women’s private body like the fertile and flowering nature. It was a really
provocative and innovative approach.
This
aesthetic sense is actually driven by the creative energies of modernist art.
It made his poetry really surreal. When he wrote about Machu Picchu, he made
the achievements of Inca civilization both aesthetic and poetic material. Thus
we can say that Neruda used modernist methods of imagery he absorbed from
French and African art in poetry with the best use of Spanish verse. He was
influenced by the surrealist imagery of Lorca as well. The anarchist threshold
of Lorca ignited Neruda to the pinnacles of poetic astuteness. Neruda became more and more political and
became more and more clear and sharp in his poetic approach.
This
transition is not much visible in Yeats and but he continued to write in paganistic
vein. His pessimistic melancholy has encompassed more and more humanscapes and
became true emotive expressions of a national spirit to the Hegelian scales
that Germany had seen in the advent of 20th century.
So
to summarise, we can see that Yeats and Neruda scene the deeper landscapes of
human history, through different lenses. Yeats ignited poetry to the fiery
ranges through conventional style and diction to depict the deplorable fate of
imperialism and alienation of a lifelong lover of feminine energy and
intellect. Neruda through the regenerating poetic brilliance spanning mythical
human history and natural imagery in the surrealist realms draw a world of
monumental scales that has universal reverberations.
@Gokul Alex
No comments:
Post a Comment